Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 05:51:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00D9B842B8F532C5E4159DCB7443408832331D526F5B0AD52E087EFB9B162F7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Innonence presumption exists, until J&J is found guilty, or there is enough evidence to support that they had knowledge of the benzene the note is misleading. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/presumption_of_innocence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868139037506088973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00D9B842B8F532C5E4159DCB7443408832331D526F5B0AD52E087EFB9B162F7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1734241867061
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 186813903750608897300D9B842B8F532C5E4159DCB7443408832331D526F5B0AD52E087EFB9B162F7D