Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 18:37:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61599BAC4469B422880DF668272581F03049EEAC262D3A8B490C3DF8880752B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This image comes from a book called "IQ and Global Inequality" which is widely disputed due to the author using unrepresentative sample sizes of smaller countries and ignoring data that didn't fit his hypothesis. This is a statistically invalid study. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality#Reception

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1868110731570245733
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61599BAC4469B422880DF668272581F03049EEAC262D3A8B490C3DF8880752B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1734287823528
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186811073157024573361599BAC4469B422880DF668272581F03049EEAC262D3A8B490C3DF8880752B5