Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-14 21:07:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B33AFC0AFDCE0B5A55E121B10B08C9CB94CCBED7B1F91AC52B9D34D5BC48CC97
Participant Details

Original Note:

Elon's Twitter move was strategic buying, not insider trading. His public 9.2% stake disclosure actually hiked the price, inflating the $44B acquisition cost. Not only was it legal, but it actually might have been a financial mistake costing him extra money. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/04/02/does-target-firm-insider-trading-signal-the-targets-synergy-potential-in-mergers-and-acquisitions/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867960259882451325
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B33AFC0AFDCE0B5A55E121B10B08C9CB94CCBED7B1F91AC52B9D34D5BC48CC97
  • createdAtMillis - 1734210450105
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1867960259882451325B33AFC0AFDCE0B5A55E121B10B08C9CB94CCBED7B1F91AC52B9D34D5BC48CC97