Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-12-14 19:24:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EA75872EDB5359135A65C2C5B5E0E6E5C174EE319CED601C904021515E7FF9BD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Article represents ABA as evidence-based, but Cochrane Review & others show ABA does not have a strong evidence base; in fact ABA research is rife w/COIs & methods failures. Article fails to mention former patents call ABA abusive & autistic groups oppose it. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34025538/ https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009260.pub3/full https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1311956/pdf/jaba00060-0003.pdf https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/05/anti-gay-activist-hires-gay-escort-to-lift-his-luggage/345699/ https://web.archive.org/web/20240705205420/https:/abacontroversyautism.wordpress.com/2017/09/06/thomas-story/ https://web.archive.org/web/20240704233923/https:/just1voice.com/neurodiversity/autism/ole-ivar-lovaas-interview-about-autism/ https://a4aontario.com/2020/12/06/2020-has-not-been-a-good-year-for-aba-a-research-review/
All Note Details