Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 18:50:33 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45AF79D9AD511E267EC31DAC1F09AE837D4173B4C902F69247E419CFB9DEE9A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn. The 97% figure or similar is produced by more than one source (see references 1,2, & 3 in link). Quoting a 10 year old Guardian blog that itself says the figure may be right does not debunk it. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01928-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867835206142423091
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45AF79D9AD511E267EC31DAC1F09AE837D4173B4C902F69247E419CFB9DEE9A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1734288633119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186783520614242309145AF79D9AD511E267EC31DAC1F09AE837D4173B4C902F69247E419CFB9DEE9A5