Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-15 16:58:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E932A18A5AAD08876C0AF5C253FFD40849E97ACFA0375E49408F04509FA377B
Participant Details

Original Note:

性被害に具体的な定義はなく、投稿者は事件とならないようなものまで含めた上で、個人的感覚での割合を述べているため、99.9%の真偽を客観的に判別することはできません。 よって誤解を招くとは言い切れないため、ノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867772029577154791
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E932A18A5AAD08876C0AF5C253FFD40849E97ACFA0375E49408F04509FA377B
  • createdAtMillis - 1734281880331
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18677720295771547919E932A18A5AAD08876C0AF5C253FFD40849E97ACFA0375E49408F04509FA377B