Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-14 10:50:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AC87FEFE70218C4EEE3589A52CC57A246B8B38B6666A329D863E51BBFAC4BAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

性被害に具体的な定義はなく、投稿者は事件とならないようなものまで含めた上で、個人的感覚での割合を述べているため、99.9%の真偽を客観的に判別することはできません。 よって誤解を招くとは言い切れないため、ノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867772029577154791
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AC87FEFE70218C4EEE3589A52CC57A246B8B38B6666A329D863E51BBFAC4BAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1734173452867
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18677720295771547916AC87FEFE70218C4EEE3589A52CC57A246B8B38B6666A329D863E51BBFAC4BAF