Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 23:15:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 72EF90F232908980F4AB090B535FEA8A06722A83D60509A74272956B1C6FA689
Participant Details

Original Note:

Comme chaque année, ce classement repose sur des avis subjectifs d'internautes, non représentatifs de la population, et non sur des données officielles. Déjà pointé du doigt en 2022 par l'AFP, il ne permet pas de tirer des conclusions fiables sur la criminalité des villes. https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32A83V8

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867699591027528188
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 72EF90F232908980F4AB090B535FEA8A06722A83D60509A74272956B1C6FA689
  • createdAtMillis - 1734131750047
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 186769959102752818872EF90F232908980F4AB090B535FEA8A06722A83D60509A74272956B1C6FA689