Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 18:45:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91FB8251F240BBBD121C22D2B54B578B53D587C55481C9DC3E9E54282AB6079F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review's conclusion is rejected by many health institutions outside the UK, incl. American Academy of Pediatrics, Endocrine Society, Canadian Pediatric Society, VUMc Amsterdam, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Review#Response_from_other_health_bodies_globally

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867619084495466602
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91FB8251F240BBBD121C22D2B54B578B53D587C55481C9DC3E9E54282AB6079F
  • createdAtMillis - 1734115555400
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186761908449546660291FB8251F240BBBD121C22D2B54B578B53D587C55481C9DC3E9E54282AB6079F