Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-14 01:24:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A3B184E0D413CECB392D8742E064E67F64F86C5FC3010AEA2069C97BA5B93D0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

O que o Ministro Gilmar disse vai no exato sentido do entendimento da doutrina jurídica majoritária. Não se trata de algo novo ou que foi instituído pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, se trata, simplesmente, da evolução da concepção do que é o Direito. https://www.cnj.jus.br/enquanto-houver-omissao-do-estado-o-poder-judiciario-pode-e-deve-interferir-diz-juiz-auxiliar/ https://www.conjur.com.br/2015-mai-10/entrevista-dirley-cunha-junior-juiz-federal-professor/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867578457326002241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A3B184E0D413CECB392D8742E064E67F64F86C5FC3010AEA2069C97BA5B93D0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1734139441881
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1867578457326002241A3B184E0D413CECB392D8742E064E67F64F86C5FC3010AEA2069C97BA5B93D0B