Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 16:15:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1767F2A43353BDB576B228B88870FB002FAA147B74C568BFF173C72A267783F
Participant Details

Original Note:

O que o Ministro Gilmar disse vai no exato sentido do entendimento da doutrina jurídica majoritária. Não se trata de algo novo ou que foi instituído pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, se trata, simplesmente, da evolução da concepção do que é o Direito. https://www.cnj.jus.br/enquanto-houver-omissao-do-estado-o-poder-judiciario-pode-e-deve-interferir-diz-juiz-auxiliar/ https://www.conjur.com.br/2015-mai-10/entrevista-dirley-cunha-junior-juiz-federal-professor/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867578457326002241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A1767F2A43353BDB576B228B88870FB002FAA147B74C568BFF173C72A267783F
  • createdAtMillis - 1734106502691
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1867578457326002241A1767F2A43353BDB576B228B88870FB002FAA147B74C568BFF173C72A267783F