Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 19:17:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 894239A221A257948946739C501247C96BF58567450CD70411EC2750B7EDFFE6
Participant Details

Original Note:

O que o Ministro Gilmar disse vai no exato sentido do entendimento da doutrina jurídica majoritária. Não se trata de algo novo ou que foi instituído pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, se trata, simplesmente, da evolução da concepção do que é o Direito. https://www.cnj.jus.br/enquanto-houver-omissao-do-estado-o-poder-judiciario-pode-e-deve-interferir-diz-juiz-auxiliar/ https://www.conjur.com.br/2015-mai-10/entrevista-dirley-cunha-junior-juiz-federal-professor/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867578457326002241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 894239A221A257948946739C501247C96BF58567450CD70411EC2750B7EDFFE6
  • createdAtMillis - 1734117452360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1867578457326002241894239A221A257948946739C501247C96BF58567450CD70411EC2750B7EDFFE6