Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 16:17:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7CC14026864F84C36E48760A480579E94C8BAC76426F9B2FDA9BF220280389CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

O que o Ministro Gilmar disse vai no exato sentido do entendimento da doutrina jurídica majoritária. Não se trata de algo novo ou que foi instituído pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, se trata, simplesmente, da evolução da concepção do que é o Direito. https://www.cnj.jus.br/enquanto-houver-omissao-do-estado-o-poder-judiciario-pode-e-deve-interferir-diz-juiz-auxiliar/ https://www.conjur.com.br/2015-mai-10/entrevista-dirley-cunha-junior-juiz-federal-professor/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867578457326002241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7CC14026864F84C36E48760A480579E94C8BAC76426F9B2FDA9BF220280389CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1734106622991
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18675784573260022417CC14026864F84C36E48760A480579E94C8BAC76426F9B2FDA9BF220280389CD