Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-14 15:30:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CB17B35BD3551F8224C52241E7795B7B83433D992869DF8581A51D957AB3601
Participant Details

Original Note:

O que o Ministro Gilmar disse vai no exato sentido do entendimento da doutrina jurídica majoritária. Não se trata de algo novo ou que foi instituído pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, se trata, simplesmente, da evolução da concepção do que é o Direito. https://www.cnj.jus.br/enquanto-houver-omissao-do-estado-o-poder-judiciario-pode-e-deve-interferir-diz-juiz-auxiliar/ https://www.conjur.com.br/2015-mai-10/entrevista-dirley-cunha-junior-juiz-federal-professor/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867578457326002241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CB17B35BD3551F8224C52241E7795B7B83433D992869DF8581A51D957AB3601
  • createdAtMillis - 1734190200690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18675784573260022410CB17B35BD3551F8224C52241E7795B7B83433D992869DF8581A51D957AB3601