Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 20:14:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95A1414A339BBF1E7E49EEDDCD2FABE3ACE35A83570F0CB277CF8FE94C0A19AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CFPB’s funding structure is not “constitutionally dubious.” The Supreme Court held that an appropriation is a law that authorizes expenditures from a specified source of public money for designated purpose, and that the CFPB satisfies this rule and is constitutional. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-448_o7jp.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867577332057124959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95A1414A339BBF1E7E49EEDDCD2FABE3ACE35A83570F0CB277CF8FE94C0A19AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1734120895104
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186757733205712495995A1414A339BBF1E7E49EEDDCD2FABE3ACE35A83570F0CB277CF8FE94C0A19AC