Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 20:41:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 092C872592C20F22161D826CE9E5D14DC1E01439E0FCE8669F8EA460AB55AB22
Participant Details

Original Note:

Auch wenn der Durchsuchungsbeschluss bereits ausgestellt war, bevor Habeck den Strafantrag unterschrieben hat, hätte es keine Hausdurchsuchung gegeben, wenn Habeck sich geweigert hätte, den Strafantrag zu unterzeichnen. https://www.nius.de/politik/news/durchsuchung-wegen-schwachkopf-habeck-mal-spricht-staatsanwaltschaft-von-volksverhetzung-dann-wieder-nicht/ea452a2a-73ff-40e7-b3c9-192e616e676e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1867287726921314488
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 092C872592C20F22161D826CE9E5D14DC1E01439E0FCE8669F8EA460AB55AB22
createdAtMillis - 1734036090957
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1867287726921314488092C872592C20F22161D826CE9E5D14DC1E01439E0FCE8669F8EA460AB55AB22