Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 18:28:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5608B2665E2CCFA4BE413DF841B480F49B927F8FDD8FADA6C52D5357CA4DC60
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Kramnik’s personal opinion is that this was a “childish” blunder. It is reasonable to believe that blundering a relatively simple theoretically drawn position meets this standard.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867261520138383820
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5608B2665E2CCFA4BE413DF841B480F49B927F8FDD8FADA6C52D5357CA4DC60
  • createdAtMillis - 1734028084701
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1867261520138383820B5608B2665E2CCFA4BE413DF841B480F49B927F8FDD8FADA6C52D5357CA4DC60