Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 16:29:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4D7235CD54ABF2C06C87B75ECE343FDF9E6580107475750D4D0F06AF900C003
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Not misleading, since the metrics are clearly indicated on the x and y axis. Hence, the reader can make up their own mind about the validity of the comparison and the CN is better suited for the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867197166218829856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4D7235CD54ABF2C06C87B75ECE343FDF9E6580107475750D4D0F06AF900C003
  • createdAtMillis - 1734020967440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1867197166218829856C4D7235CD54ABF2C06C87B75ECE343FDF9E6580107475750D4D0F06AF900C003