Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 22:03:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6970350C2D3EB4864B1EE7E53B3E1EFA793BD600F326108680B44A3D8F73BBCF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Not misleading, since the metrics are clearly indicated on the x and y axis. Hence, the reader can make up their own mind about the validity of the comparison and the CN is better suited for the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867197166218829856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6970350C2D3EB4864B1EE7E53B3E1EFA793BD600F326108680B44A3D8F73BBCF
  • createdAtMillis - 1734041029375
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18671971662188298566970350C2D3EB4864B1EE7E53B3E1EFA793BD600F326108680B44A3D8F73BBCF