Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 21:58:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 477074D5011386A0A5F941401C3DDCCCA4C5EC0A336CAF7B0E1D993B028CC038
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Not misleading, since the metrics are clearly indicated on the x and y axis. Hence, the reader can make up their own mind about the validity of the comparison and the CN is better suited for the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867197166218829856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 477074D5011386A0A5F941401C3DDCCCA4C5EC0A336CAF7B0E1D993B028CC038
  • createdAtMillis - 1734127093551
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1867197166218829856477074D5011386A0A5F941401C3DDCCCA4C5EC0A336CAF7B0E1D993B028CC038