Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 15:37:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B36949A223A15E4FD4501A02BB0E56546E523BC0665950A5E1FA851CEA58AF4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Not misleading, since the metrics are clearly indicated on the x and y axis. Hence, the reader can make up their own mind about the validity of the comparison and the CN is better suited for the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867197166218829856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B36949A223A15E4FD4501A02BB0E56546E523BC0665950A5E1FA851CEA58AF4
  • createdAtMillis - 1734017873321
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18671971662188298563B36949A223A15E4FD4501A02BB0E56546E523BC0665950A5E1FA851CEA58AF4