Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 13:46:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29F98C8595C029BE6567744EA04881DB4CB75EDD1A430F1BD2DF7F5B5F5016DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Not misleading, since the metrics are clearly indicated on the x and y axis. Hence, the reader can make up their own mind about the validity of the comparison and the CN is better suited for the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867197166218829856
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29F98C8595C029BE6567744EA04881DB4CB75EDD1A430F1BD2DF7F5B5F5016DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1734011175537
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186719716621882985629F98C8595C029BE6567744EA04881DB4CB75EDD1A430F1BD2DF7F5B5F5016DE