Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 16:12:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 186DE77D82BA68936662284DCFFB4870676EBC289E40E99C37FBF4A98B3FC78D
Participant Details

Original Note:

O que a CCJ aprovou, é o comprovante do voto impresso. O sistema de votação continuará sendo eletrônica, apenas com uma etapa a mais de segurança, que é a impressão do seu voto. A proposta ainda precisa ser aprovada pela Câmara e pelo Senado. Fonte: Agência Câmara de Notícias https://www.camara.leg.br/noticias/1120476-comissao-de-constituicao-e-justica-da-camara-aprova-proposta-do-voto-impresso/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867173327501922705
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 186DE77D82BA68936662284DCFFB4870676EBC289E40E99C37FBF4A98B3FC78D
  • createdAtMillis - 1734019948228
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1867173327501922705186DE77D82BA68936662284DCFFB4870676EBC289E40E99C37FBF4A98B3FC78D