Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 18:52:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38723D894C67185FFEA76C24FF34D60D7CB3D69BA9514288C7CBECB035DC49AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The OP is not misleading, they're stating an opinion based on reliability of fingerprint evidence. Take it to the comments. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32990979/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866996791767359553
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38723D894C67185FFEA76C24FF34D60D7CB3D69BA9514288C7CBECB035DC49AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1734029548487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186699679176735955338723D894C67185FFEA76C24FF34D60D7CB3D69BA9514288C7CBECB035DC49AC