Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 23:16:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCAEF41828165BF6F061DC853E96CD89E142C3834235725ED3437B14CC10CD5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ao contrário do que o autor disse, de retroceder, não é esse o intuito do voto impresso. Pelo contrário, aumentaria a confiança do eleitor de que seu voto foi registrado corretamente e possibilitaria a recontagem do resultado da eleição. https://www.justicaeleitoral.jus.br/urna-eletronica/impressao-do-voto.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866984273510642113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCAEF41828165BF6F061DC853E96CD89E142C3834235725ED3437B14CC10CD5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1733958998636
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866984273510642113BCAEF41828165BF6F061DC853E96CD89E142C3834235725ED3437B14CC10CD5F