Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 15:18:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F985BC3D570BE7F3E41E52D805DF4CCE21E940F9A966E1384F536B9DF405755
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ao contrário do que o autor disse, de retroceder, não é esse o intuito do voto impresso. Pelo contrário, aumentaria a confiança do eleitor de que seu voto foi registrado corretamente e possibilitaria a recontagem do resultado da eleição. https://www.justicaeleitoral.jus.br/urna-eletronica/impressao-do-voto.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866984273510642113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F985BC3D570BE7F3E41E52D805DF4CCE21E940F9A966E1384F536B9DF405755
  • createdAtMillis - 1734103094873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18669842735106421139F985BC3D570BE7F3E41E52D805DF4CCE21E940F9A966E1384F536B9DF405755