Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 22:27:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD9F9BE9B651FFA833A593428F823B3EF32D932CC44F3234349E89341A8A557B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Report is a politically led report that is not supported by experts in endocrinology or transgender care. There was also a clear bias within how the review was conducted. And the Cass Review never called for a ban on blockers. https://www.gla.ac.uk/explore/glasgowsocialscienceshub/resources/all/headline_1105099_en.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866956581927301339
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD9F9BE9B651FFA833A593428F823B3EF32D932CC44F3234349E89341A8A557B
  • createdAtMillis - 1733956041877
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866956581927301339AD9F9BE9B651FFA833A593428F823B3EF32D932CC44F3234349E89341A8A557B