Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 23:28:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09C34284E10435D699BF27483C44C109B5B731674DBBB2C00701A13E7A03EAA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Report is a politically led report that is not supported by experts in endocrinology or transgender care. There was also a clear bias within how the review was conducted. And the Cass Review never called for a ban on blockers. https://www.gla.ac.uk/explore/glasgowsocialscienceshub/resources/all/headline_1105099_en.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866956581927301339
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 09C34284E10435D699BF27483C44C109B5B731674DBBB2C00701A13E7A03EAA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1733959683223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186695658192730133909C34284E10435D699BF27483C44C109B5B731674DBBB2C00701A13E7A03EAA4