Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 15:49:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AFDE47DF6AF0A4AC308A8484AFFD6B5AEE8A8012CD59CED55EFD662EF7B0ADE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review failed to take input from the transgender community. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/ This is comparable to a review on women’s rights not taking input from women, and therefore is not fact-driven.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866926232123912675
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4AFDE47DF6AF0A4AC308A8484AFFD6B5AEE8A8012CD59CED55EFD662EF7B0ADE
  • createdAtMillis - 1734018598760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18669262321239126754AFDE47DF6AF0A4AC308A8484AFFD6B5AEE8A8012CD59CED55EFD662EF7B0ADE