Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 18:43:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EAD5FAD027ED87B6CFA67A5CADE0D1C9BDBA8E87B7D4CF4D9C2C30ED8181093F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Taking the observation at face value. Proportions can be misleading. If other channels choose not to cover various topics, that shifts the median. If inaccurate information or defamatory statements had been broadcast, OFCOM would have challenged them. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-standards/section-two-harm-offence/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1866878848094089269
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EAD5FAD027ED87B6CFA67A5CADE0D1C9BDBA8E87B7D4CF4D9C2C30ED8181093F
createdAtMillis - 1733942624198
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1866878848094089269EAD5FAD027ED87B6CFA67A5CADE0D1C9BDBA8E87B7D4CF4D9C2C30ED8181093F