Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 21:51:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9BAD45F448CB04F05B066DBCD69C6901DB1A8AD06E9DEBE70EE7AC26BECD88CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Taking the observation at face value. Proportions can be misleading. If other channels choose not to cover various topics, that shifts the median. If inaccurate information or defamatory statements had been broadcast, OFCOM would have challenged them. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-standards/section-two-harm-offence/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1866878848094089269
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9BAD45F448CB04F05B066DBCD69C6901DB1A8AD06E9DEBE70EE7AC26BECD88CB
createdAtMillis - 1733953878263
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18668788480940892699BAD45F448CB04F05B066DBCD69C6901DB1A8AD06E9DEBE70EE7AC26BECD88CB