Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 11:18:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B28AEC0BCCC0FCF9D8263851FCEA6B542D574A2577B6B93F49794895DABBFE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Taking the observation at face value. Proportions can be misleading. If other channels choose not to cover various topics, that shifts the median. If inaccurate information or defamatory statements had been broadcast, OFCOM would have challenged them. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-standards/section-two-harm-offence/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1866878848094089269
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9B28AEC0BCCC0FCF9D8263851FCEA6B542D574A2577B6B93F49794895DABBFE2
createdAtMillis - 1734002298565
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18668788480940892699B28AEC0BCCC0FCF9D8263851FCEA6B542D574A2577B6B93F49794895DABBFE2