Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 16:47:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53D557F48B5F76F3317D92DAA0CFA3A269DCBA871B8E138F7CD66628410E3039
Participant Details

Original Note:

Taking the observation at face value. Proportions can be misleading. If other channels choose not to cover various topics, that shifts the median. If inaccurate information or defamatory statements had been broadcast, OFCOM would have challenged them. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-standards/section-two-harm-offence/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1866878848094089269
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 53D557F48B5F76F3317D92DAA0CFA3A269DCBA871B8E138F7CD66628410E3039
createdAtMillis - 1733935645356
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 186687884809408926953D557F48B5F76F3317D92DAA0CFA3A269DCBA871B8E138F7CD66628410E3039