Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 07:58:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D25C8CA9C284D2E6C7E53CA9359D2740F65AE8CF062909AB7BC7B297884D63E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como explica el siguiente usuario de X. The economist solo se basa en 5 factores y omite muchos otros. https://x.com/pmiguelez/status/1866791113794769295?s=46&t=GwF6vNzDpNNFnXZWwKSY0A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866821729789555153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D25C8CA9C284D2E6C7E53CA9359D2740F65AE8CF062909AB7BC7B297884D63E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1733990334461
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1866821729789555153D25C8CA9C284D2E6C7E53CA9359D2740F65AE8CF062909AB7BC7B297884D63E8