Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 07:44:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AF4C2687423A85A1F9D5250EBDC69B9CE94F9BFB3E3F49FA0150FA74018FEDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como explica el siguiente usuario de X. The economist solo se basa en 5 factores y omite muchos otros. https://x.com/pmiguelez/status/1866791113794769295?s=46&t=GwF6vNzDpNNFnXZWwKSY0A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866821729789555153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AF4C2687423A85A1F9D5250EBDC69B9CE94F9BFB3E3F49FA0150FA74018FEDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1733989477071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18668217297895551536AF4C2687423A85A1F9D5250EBDC69B9CE94F9BFB3E3F49FA0150FA74018FEDF