Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 13:02:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D55F4D56EBC5E90240930A7637555C1700E62E68954EC5541788056F0F2ABF88
Participant Details

Original Note:

Arguably NNN and the person writing the note should take it up in debate with OP, who already mentioned that the analysis depends on using actual income and not GDP. The following blog post summarizes the nuanced topic: https://randomcriticalanalysis.com/why-conventional-wisdom-on-health-care-is-wrong-a-primer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866796518558113918
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D55F4D56EBC5E90240930A7637555C1700E62E68954EC5541788056F0F2ABF88
  • createdAtMillis - 1733922131596
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866796518558113918D55F4D56EBC5E90240930A7637555C1700E62E68954EC5541788056F0F2ABF88