Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 15:05:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A89EDBB5F18018AE5859DCD21869079CB8178627907A036864EACF5F1F582494
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post and proposed note are two sides of the debate of negative vs. positive rights, both are opinions. Owing to a long history of corruption and criminal activities that directly harm human welfare, the UN is not a reliable source on what constitutes a human right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_United_Nations

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866734564720197880
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A89EDBB5F18018AE5859DCD21869079CB8178627907A036864EACF5F1F582494
  • createdAtMillis - 1733929527881
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866734564720197880A89EDBB5F18018AE5859DCD21869079CB8178627907A036864EACF5F1F582494