Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 02:38:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3B6E36CF4A40AF29FBB4703BF2F9034E425EF341273A4BD282BD901E25D90D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- Sample sizes need not be huge to be statistically significant. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/howcan-a-poll-of-only-100/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866654455283806379
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3B6E36CF4A40AF29FBB4703BF2F9034E425EF341273A4BD282BD901E25D90D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1733884701727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866654455283806379B3B6E36CF4A40AF29FBB4703BF2F9034E425EF341273A4BD282BD901E25D90D1