Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 17:00:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F56F30B9E8F16F5479FD35B0B94AECFA1AE149922C54F72969389769CD7A758
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- Sample sizes need not be huge to be statistically significant. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/howcan-a-poll-of-only-100/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866654455283806379
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F56F30B9E8F16F5479FD35B0B94AECFA1AE149922C54F72969389769CD7A758
  • createdAtMillis - 1733936433329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18666544552838063794F56F30B9E8F16F5479FD35B0B94AECFA1AE149922C54F72969389769CD7A758