Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 20:37:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 166E928A2B6A709D837C5C5EE266A75B6961815A5A6930EE217E2BBD1B77CBE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study was published in a journal focused on discrediting vaccines, with a history of publishing false information. That does not mean the study is wrong, or that the results are meaningless until a casual mechanism is identified. It means a CN is needed to alert readers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Journal_of_Vaccine_Theory,_Practice,_and_Research

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866567138347040894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 166E928A2B6A709D837C5C5EE266A75B6961815A5A6930EE217E2BBD1B77CBE3
  • createdAtMillis - 1733863041952
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866567138347040894166E928A2B6A709D837C5C5EE266A75B6961815A5A6930EE217E2BBD1B77CBE3