Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 17:46:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75DF874239C1634C3D119953821D66F7C0C4752611F32930B259FDBE274B53A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article reads: Birmingham 'Scientist' analysed PM2.5 samples collected as far back as 2021 + 2022 at ONLY TWO sites in ONLY Birmingham.Not robust science. Not recent. Not scientific sampling. Poor methodology. Not credible. Headline is incorrect as overextrapolated data. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gees/shi-zongbo

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866514929160728857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75DF874239C1634C3D119953821D66F7C0C4752611F32930B259FDBE274B53A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1733852786385
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186651492916072885775DF874239C1634C3D119953821D66F7C0C4752611F32930B259FDBE274B53A5