Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 18:34:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2E63C88E9D14AEBB7EA92D958BE34BB96F82E9310391339F64FF9E5AFD52E81
Participant Details

Original Note:

Que un periodista llame defraudador confeso a quien ha confesado dos delitos fiscales es correcto y carece de consecuencias penales. Si fuera en sede judicial y un juez tuviese delante la confesión del defraudador, tendría que condenar a éste: sí tendría consecuencias penales.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866457136659865983
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2E63C88E9D14AEBB7EA92D958BE34BB96F82E9310391339F64FF9E5AFD52E81
  • createdAtMillis - 1733942054581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866457136659865983F2E63C88E9D14AEBB7EA92D958BE34BB96F82E9310391339F64FF9E5AFD52E81