Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 15:51:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9916F74001A29CE2AD66FB5C130EF63A5E7DEE511A29FDB397BA9B1E83210F8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Que un periodista llame defraudador confeso a quien ha confesado dos delitos fiscales es correcto y carece de consecuencias penales. Si fuera en sede judicial y un juez tuviese delante la confesión del defraudador, tendría que condenar a éste: sí tendría consecuencias penales.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866457136659865983
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9916F74001A29CE2AD66FB5C130EF63A5E7DEE511A29FDB397BA9B1E83210F8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1733845905831
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18664571366598659839916F74001A29CE2AD66FB5C130EF63A5E7DEE511A29FDB397BA9B1E83210F8F