Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-11 13:10:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FF00262AB518588B6492682867EB79C9276166E5D8B325C6EC56A72AAED539D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Que un periodista llame defraudador confeso a quien ha confesado dos delitos fiscales es correcto y carece de consecuencias penales. Si fuera en sede judicial y un juez tuviese delante la confesión del defraudador, tendría que condenar a éste: sí tendría consecuencias penales.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866457136659865983
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FF00262AB518588B6492682867EB79C9276166E5D8B325C6EC56A72AAED539D
  • createdAtMillis - 1733922600279
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18664571366598659831FF00262AB518588B6492682867EB79C9276166E5D8B325C6EC56A72AAED539D