Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 20:39:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 496EA8FA28450DEE668F260282F92D969095193ADF9586E90EC27ED8747577DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The bill wanted to compensate for the tax loss by "putting in place an excess profit tax targeting the largest and most profitable corporations". This would've raised prices everywhere as big retailers would've passed the hike on consumers, negating the tax cut's benefits. https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/votes/44/1/914

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866369418655064227
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 496EA8FA28450DEE668F260282F92D969095193ADF9586E90EC27ED8747577DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1733863159526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866369418655064227496EA8FA28450DEE668F260282F92D969095193ADF9586E90EC27ED8747577DA