Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-12 07:33:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B552A6CD6DE9B1E2655415583BE378BC7D915F69A3D5D1873D3F8D7631B9099
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP correctly states that a new study has been published, which in the opinion of the OP, has "concerning" findings. Disagreement with the OP's characterization of the findings, which he exhaustively details in the linked article, belongs in the comments. https://t.co/9J2P19MWyH

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866288947011190846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B552A6CD6DE9B1E2655415583BE378BC7D915F69A3D5D1873D3F8D7631B9099
  • createdAtMillis - 1733988812283
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18662889470111908469B552A6CD6DE9B1E2655415583BE378BC7D915F69A3D5D1873D3F8D7631B9099