Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 21:03:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFFA3FF9DA5EBAF072AE80CC9C7256B14822D1F0AFF08E9F2E49E3EBA95A4284
Participant Details

Original Note:

The plaintiffs alleged that the COVID-19 shots were not vaccines and could therefore not be made mandatory. The court took the plaintiffs allegation as true, therefore agreeing, with the plaintiffs, that COVID-19 shorts are not vaccines and could therefore not be made mandatory.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866185403151372694
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFFA3FF9DA5EBAF072AE80CC9C7256B14822D1F0AFF08E9F2E49E3EBA95A4284
  • createdAtMillis - 1733864637067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866185403151372694BFFA3FF9DA5EBAF072AE80CC9C7256B14822D1F0AFF08E9F2E49E3EBA95A4284