Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-09 17:25:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EF02D8509C6164749B7C315B257C4AB2972C20003670A07B7E5FCC9597505EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

All the points in the proposed community note are covered by the article for anyone who cares to read through it. Otherwise the post headline isn't, at face value, misleading. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866168839807127843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9EF02D8509C6164749B7C315B257C4AB2972C20003670A07B7E5FCC9597505EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1733765150422
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18661688398071278439EF02D8509C6164749B7C315B257C4AB2972C20003670A07B7E5FCC9597505EF