Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 05:32:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A90B5397E1B549189AFE158CA0BD4AA11CE71C13BF5D9C40E0CBA6EB420D51CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claim could be considered speculative given no direct evidence is provided to support the assertion that federal government IT systems often fail to verify fraud, waste, or abuse. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/argument/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866162219593159030
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A90B5397E1B549189AFE158CA0BD4AA11CE71C13BF5D9C40E0CBA6EB420D51CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1733808735926
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866162219593159030A90B5397E1B549189AFE158CA0BD4AA11CE71C13BF5D9C40E0CBA6EB420D51CC