Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-10 08:55:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9F6D87BA106CD5A694A4D61A9E82C05972631ECD183CB1F2666F60EC3B4BBE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

While fancy blossom flycatcher's note does express one opinion, it must be noted that the controlling case US vs Wong Kim Ark involved a child born in the US of foreign citizens who were lawfully present, not unlawfully so as would be acted on by President-elect Trump. https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/supreme-court-case-library/united-states-v-wong-kim-ark-1898

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1866098323695738925
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9F6D87BA106CD5A694A4D61A9E82C05972631ECD183CB1F2666F60EC3B4BBE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1733820926240
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1866098323695738925D9F6D87BA106CD5A694A4D61A9E82C05972631ECD183CB1F2666F60EC3B4BBE5